Virtual Covid-19 summit with little chance

Using virtual structures today, the world’s leadership, including President Biden, Second COVID-19 summit To “double the effort” to control the pandemic. In a “virtual” document, this meeting will be attended by the most important leaders involved in the fight against the epidemic. However, it is very unlikely that anything meaningful will come out of this meeting and will be defiant at best.

And why should expectations be so lukewarm with the brilliance and panoramic views of these contestants? Because we are witnessing meetings where the financial pledges are very poor. Instead, asking for a donation rather than discussing global planning options will be a key question and focus. What summit organizers didn’t realize is always about money. If you’re a serious player, don’t go into a casino with empty pockets. you bring money

Consistent domestic and international finance covid-19 Strategies have been lacking since the virus first appeared. Government leaders around the world have ignored the reality that COVID-19 and the health of our economy are inextricably linked, and capital markets are now saying the world is not prepared for this long-term conflict.

After more than two years of fighting COVID-19, we are witnessing signs of problematic inflation and systemic exhaustion fueled by the long-term prospects of an ongoing pandemic. To make this even more bleak, global capital markets have been experiencing an orderly decline in prices since January. There is every possibility of a sharp recession or even a collapse like the one that happened in 2008, leaving the discussion almost surreal.

President Biden requested $22.5 billion in domestic financing To prepare for the next wave of epidemics. He also asked Congress for $10 billion in global Covid-19 aid, but had to cut the request to $5 billion and separate it from funding the Ukraine war. He agreed to avoid delays in war support. Outcome: New Covid-19 funding is still wilting. Unless Congress takes action, there will soon be no funding to support existing efforts or to develop innovative and more effective treatments.

He has been a political stepchild since COVID-19 first appeared. At first, the previous administration denied the possibility of harm and its existence. It developed into a happy era of ignorance that inspired the public to believe that this disease would be no worse than the seasonal flu. When it turned out not to be right, all attention was focused on vaccination (to prevent like the flu) while not ignoring or funding testing, sequencing, public education and treatment development measures. With growing evidence that the protection we can get from recovering from an acute infection or from vaccination is weakening, we can no longer pretend that Covid-19 will be gone soon. past epidemics and especially 1889-1890 PandemicCovid-19 will not reach endemic state for at least the next two years.

Here, the rate of Covid-19 infections in the US, China and elsewhere is starting to rise again. The prospect of health restrictions being imposed again fuels frustration and outrage. The United States is unprepared for the next Covid-19 surge, whether the current strain, or worse, that comes from a new strain that combines more contagiousness with more toxicity. The administration’s recent announcement tells Americans: Up to 100 million new Covid-19 predicted Infection this fall and winter. This corresponds to about 30% of the total population. Even if these infections are mild (large), they can cause huge personal and economic damage.

Although not reported uniformly in the public health system, a new surge has already begun. On March 27, the number of new cases reported in the United States reached a low of nearly 7,000. By last Monday they had grown to 73,000. Lagging indicators of increased hospitalizations and deaths will soon follow. Cases are expected to rise first in the southern United States this summer as people take shelter indoors to escape the heat, followed by a surge in northern states as the weather cools in the fall.

A group of global nonprofits has filed a petition criticizing the United States for being “warning and short-sighted” and “lack of leadership.” They want the U.S. to raise $48 billion this year to support Covid-19 and lead pharmaceutical companies to share intellectual property and technical know-how in vaccines and antivirals. But if the United States is reluctant to allocate $22.5 billion for domestic Covid-19 defense funding, how realistic can expectations of international aid delivery be? Moreover, there are so many unanswered questions that making first world measures accessible to low- and middle-income countries ineffective or, at best, ad hoc would require rethinking their COVID-19 plans.

This is a well-meaning meeting, but we are doomed to be disappointed when we in the United States lack serious efforts to fund domestic COVID-19 relief, let alone international aid. The prevailing attitude seems to be that if we ignore the virus, it will go away. There is a formula for continuing catastrophe, along with a blind obsession with the belief that vaccines are the only answer and that personal preferences take precedence over science. COVID-19 is not going away. Like the grasshoppers begging for food from the ants in Aesop’s fables, we will regret that we didn’t act this winter when the virus re-emerges, and instead of doubling our efforts to find new, more effective solutions and funding plans, You will be wasting valuable time.


Leave a Comment